Yes — recovery is legal in nearly every U.S. state. Here's the legal framework, state regulations, and fee caps explained.
One of the first questions people ask before getting into surplus funds recovery is whether it's actually legal. The short answer is yes, in the large majority of states, this is a legal, well-established activity built directly into state law. But 'legal' doesn't mean 'identical everywhere.' The rules on licensing, fee caps, and paperwork are different in every state, and getting them wrong can cost you a deal or worse.
This is not legal advice, and it's not a substitute for checking your own state's current statutes or talking to a local attorney. Laws change. What follows is a general breakdown to help you understand what actually varies from state to state.
Three things differ by state, and they matter a lot. Whether a non-attorney can file the claim themselves, or whether an attorney has to handle the court filing. Whether there's a cap on what a recovery agent or finder can charge, and how much that cap is. Whether the state requires any kind of registration or license beyond forming a normal business entity.
Get any of these three wrong in a given state and you can void your own fee agreement, or worse. This is why 'legal in general' isn't the same as 'compliant in this specific state.'
In several states, a non-attorney can prepare and file the surplus claim directly on behalf of the former owner, as long as the contingency agreement follows that state's rules.
Florida: Non-attorney assignees can file, but total compensation is capped at 12% of the surplus under Florida Statute Section 45.033, and the assignment agreement has specific formatting and disclosure requirements.
Ohio: Recovery agreements are enforceable under Ohio Revised Code Section 2329.44, which governs how surplus funds get distributed after a sheriff's sale.
Arizona: Governed by Arizona Revised Statutes Section 33-812, which covers excess proceeds from a trustee's sale.
Nevada: Governed by Nevada Revised Statutes Section 361.610 for tax sale excess proceeds.
Oregon: The Oregon Department of Revenue publishes a foreclosure surplus claims process directly on its unclaimed property site.
Georgia: Claims are handled county by county under O.C.G.A. Section 48-4-5, and the exact process can differ depending on which county's tax commissioner is holding the funds.
Indiana: Governed by Indiana Code Section 6-1.1-24-7.5, which caps a recovery agreement at 10% and makes any agreement that doesn't meet the statute's requirements void.
In other states, the process runs through the court system in a way that makes an attorney's involvement necessary or close to necessary.
Texas: Under Texas Tax Code Section 34.04, a non-attorney cannot charge a fee to help someone claim excess proceeds. This makes Texas one of the strictest states for this business model.
Washington: Excess proceeds claims typically require a court petition, and fee arrangements are scrutinized closely by the court.
New Jersey: Governed by N.J.S.A. 2A:50-37, which requires a court application for surplus funds from a sheriff's sale.
North Carolina: Under North Carolina General Statute 45-21.32, surplus proceeds from a foreclosure sale are paid into the clerk of court, and North Carolina General Statute 116B-78 requires anyone acting as a finder for unclaimed property to register with the state treasurer's office before contacting owners.
South Carolina: Handled through a Master-in-Equity or clerk of court process, varying by county.
Illinois: Under Public Act 104-0553, Illinois updated its tax sale surplus process, and claims run through the circuit court.
California deserves its own callout. Under California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4675, a former owner has exactly one year from the recording of the tax deed to file a claim for excess proceeds, and the county is required to hold those funds for that full year before they can escheat. Miss that window and the money typically goes to the state or, in some cases, to other claimants in the priority order set by the statute. California's process is also unusually document-heavy compared to many other states, so accuracy on filings matters even more here.
Being legal does not mean unregulated. A few things people commonly assume that are not accurate everywhere: it is not true that you never need any state registration -- Florida requires registration under Florida Statute 717.1400 for anyone soliciting owners of unclaimed property for a fee, and North Carolina requires similar registration under North Carolina General Statute 116B-78. It is not true that a finder never needs any kind of license -- Tennessee has required individuals doing this work to hold a private investigator license, based on a ruling from the Tennessee Private Investigation and Polygraph Commission. And it is not true that the contingency fee percentage is the same everywhere -- it ranges from a hard cap of 10% in Indiana and Tennessee, to 12% in Florida, to a complete ban on non-attorney fees in Texas.
Anyone telling you this business works exactly the same way in all 50 states either hasn't checked the actual statutes, or is leaving out details that matter.
Before working any lead, in any state: read that state's actual statute governing surplus or excess funds distribution, confirm whether a licensed attorney has to file the claim in that state, confirm the maximum fee percentage allowed, if any, and confirm whether any registration is required before contacting a former owner.
This is exactly the kind of state-by-state groundwork the free masterclass walks through, using real statute citations and real case examples, so you're not guessing. Free to attend. Nothing to buy to get value out of it.
Alfred walks through the entire framework live — vetted leads, deal math, the legal process, and real cases. Free to attend. Nothing to buy to get value out of it.